Lexis › Programme › Unit 27 › Lesson 03

Eight jobs, and the four that get confused

B2 Mobility and Migration
About this lesson ▾

Discourse markers function by function — plus the punctuation rule that turns half of them into comma splices.

XP 0 Streak 0 First-try —
Lesson progress0%
01
Warm-up · 5 min

Two that are not the same

Baseline · However and nevertheless

Four questions.

1. The scheme is expensive. ___, it works. Which relation is this?

2. So which marker fits best there?

3. Cities offer opportunity. ___, they are expensive to arrive in.

4. What is the difference in one line?

02
Input · 8 min

Eight joints in one argument

On moving for work

Moving for work is usually described as a choice. To begin with, it is worth asking who is able to make it.

A move requires savings, a deposit and a period without income. Furthermore, it requires somewhere to be if the job does not last. Those conditions are unevenly distributed; in particular, they follow the same lines as everything else.

The people least able to move are therefore the ones most often described as unwilling to. Admittedly, some people genuinely do not want to leave, and that preference is real. Nevertheless, unwillingness and inability produce the same statistic, and only one of them is a fact about character.

In other words, a figure that is presented as a measure of attitude is at least partly a measure of savings. Overall, that seems worth establishing before anybody builds a policy on it.

Marker to function

Eight markers from that text. Match each to the job it is doing.

Organising — announces the first step of an argument
Adding — another point on the same side
Exemplifying — narrows to the clearest case
Causing — what follows is a consequence
Conceding — gives ground before continuing
Insisting despite — the concession does not decide it
Restating — the same claim, put differently
Concluding — weighing what has been said
03
Focus on Form · 18 min

The functions, the confusions, and the comma

Eight jobs

JobMarkersRegister
Addingfurthermore, moreover, in addition, what is more, also, besidesFirst three formal; besides is conversational
Contrastinghowever, in contrast, by contrast, whereas, whileNeutral to formal
Two-sided comparisonon the one hand … on the other handNeeds both sides, or an obvious first one
Concedingadmittedly, granted, it is true that…Opens the concession
Insisting despitenevertheless, nonetheless, even so, all the sameCloses it
Causingtherefore, consequently, as a result, hence, thusHence and thus are the most formal
Exemplifyingfor instance, for example, notably, in particularNeutral
Restating and concludingin other words, that is; in short, overall, on balanceNeutral to formal

The four that get used interchangeably, and are not

MarkerWhat it needsWhere it goes wrong
howeverTwo things that differUsed where nothing has been conceded, or where the two sentences agree
neverthelessA concession already madeUsed as a heavier however, with nothing for it to overcome
moreover / furthermoreAnother point on the same sideUsed after a contrast, where the argument has just changed direction
on the other handA first hand, stated or obviousUsed for any contrast at all, which leaves the reader looking for a side that was never given

The punctuation rule, which is worth more marks than the vocabulary. These markers are adverbs, not conjunctions. They cannot join two clauses with a comma.

It was expensive, however it worked. → It was expensive. However, it worked. · It was expensive; however, it worked. · It was expensive, but it worked.

But, and, so, although and whereas are conjunctions and do join clauses. However, therefore, moreover and nevertheless do not.

Key Word Transformation · B2+

Rewrite each sentence using the word given, keeping the relation between the ideas the same.

The scheme is expensive, but it works. NEVERTHELESS

Cities offer opportunity, but they are expensive to arrive in. HOWEVER

A move needs savings and it also needs somewhere to go if the job ends. FURTHERMORE

The conditions are unevenly distributed, so the people least able to move are called unwilling. CONSEQUENTLY

It is true that some people simply prefer to stay. ADMITTEDLY

Shape check

Five questions.

1. Which is correctly punctuated?

2. The data is limited. ___, the pattern is consistent across all four studies.

3. Housing is expensive. ___, transport costs have risen sharply.

4. When can you use on the other hand?

5. Which of these joins two clauses with a comma?

04
Guided Practice · 14 min

The right joint

Multiple-Choice Cloze · B2+

Eight gaps. The relation between the sentences decides each one.

Moving for work requires savings. it requires somewhere to go if the job ends. Those conditions are unevenly distributed; they follow the same lines as everything else. The people least able to move are the ones most often described as unwilling. some people genuinely prefer to stay, and that preference is real. unwillingness and inability produce the same statistic. a figure presented as a measure of attitude is partly a measure of savings. that is worth establishing before a policy is built on it. It is not, , an argument against helping people to move.

Error Correction

Eight sentences. Seven contain an error; one is correct.

1. It was expensive, however it worked.

2. Housing costs have risen. However, transport costs have risen too.

3. The data is limited. Furthermore, the pattern is consistent.

4. On the other hand, the scheme is expensive. — no first side has been given

5. The conditions are unequal, therefore the statistic is misleading.

6. Admittedly, some people prefer to stay. Nevertheless, that preference is real.

7. In conclusion, moreover, the framework is useful.

8. Cities offer opportunity; however, they are expensive to arrive in. — correct as written

05
Communicative Task · 8 min

Name the joint

Task card · Speaking · Pairs · 8 minutes, fast

A says two sentences with a relation between them. B names the relation and supplies a marker, in four seconds.

Twenty exchanges. Swap roles every five.

  • B must say the relation first — "concession", "addition", "consequence" — and then the marker.
  • Four seconds. If B names the relation and cannot find the marker, A supplies it and the pair moves on.
  • A may not use the same relation twice in a row.
  • Keep a note of which relations produced the wrong marker. It will be concession, in both directions.

Why the relation comes first. Reaching for a marker without naming the relation is how however ends up in front of an addition and moreover in front of a contrast. Naming it takes half a second and makes the choice almost automatic.

06
Feedback · 4 min

Which relation went wrong

From the relay

Two questions.

1. Which relation produced the most wrong markers?

2. What is the difference between however and nevertheless?

Teacher note Have each pair write out one full concession — Admittedly X. Nevertheless Y. — about migration, and read three aloud. Hearing the two halves together fixes the pair faster than contrasting them in a table, because the second marker only makes sense once the first has happened.
07
Wrap-up · 3 min

Adverbs, not conjunctions

Exit Check

Two questions. Twenty seconds.

1. What goes before however when it joins two ideas?

2. When does moreover not work?

Next. The chain underneath the markers — what goes in the subject slot, and how a paragraph is packed so that a reader never has to reassemble it.