Lexis › Programme › Unit 06 › Lesson 06

Verbs that will not sit still

A2 What I Do
About this lesson ▾

The continuous is now automatic, and that is the problem — it fires on verbs that refuse it. This hour is about switching it off again.

XP 0 Streak 0 First-try —
Lesson progress0%
01
Warm-up · 4 min

Your two against the log

Read out your two errors. Your teacher will say whether each is in the log, and how many times something like it happened.

Warm-up

One question before we open the log.

1. You said I am knowing in Lesson 5, and in Lesson 2 you got that rule right. What happened?

Teacher note Name it as progress, exactly as in Unit 3: overgeneralisation is evidence the rule has been learnt. She produced I know correctly for five units before this unit taught her the continuous.
02
Input & Noticing · 8 min

The log

From Lesson 5 — verbatim

1. I am not understanding the new system.

2. At the moment I am covering for two people.

3. I am working in a bank. I have been there nine years.

4. She want to leave early.

5. We are making progress, slowly.

6. I am wanting more time on this.

7. My colleague train the new people every year.

8. Normally I am working from home on Tuesdays.

Teacher note Swap these for her real log wherever you can. The eight are a representative spread — two state verbs in the continuous, two continuous-for-permanent, two dropped -s, two correct — so a substitution should keep that shape.
Discovery Check

Read all eight aloud before you answer.

1. How many are completely correct?

2. Sentences 1 and 6 fail the same way. How?

3. Sentences 3 and 8 fail a different way. How?

4. Sentences 4 and 7 are not about the continuous at all. What is wrong?

03
Focus on Form · 12 min

Three families, three fixes

What went wrong, and the one-line rule that fixes it

FamilyWhat it sounds likeThe rule
State verb in the continuousI am knowing · I am wantingCould you be interrupted halfway through? If not, it is a state — use the simple.
Continuous for permanentI am working in a bank (for nine years)Permanent and habitual take the simple. The continuous means temporary.
Missing third-person -sShe want · My colleague trainHe, she, it → the verb takes -s. Marked once per clause.

Families 1 and 2 pull in opposite directions. One is too much continuous on the wrong verb; the other is too much continuous on the wrong timescale. Both come from the same source — Portuguese uses estou fazendo where English uses the simple.

Family 3 is the opposite problem: when you correctly choose the simple, the -s becomes necessary again — and it is the thing you drop when you are busy choosing the tense.

Diagnose

Match each log sentence to its family. Two belong to the same one, and one is not an error at all.

State verb in the continuous
State verb in the continuous
Continuous for permanent
Continuous for habitual
Missing third-person -s
Correct — an action, in progress
04
Controlled Practice · 16 min

Repair, then produce

Error Correction

The log errors plus four more of the same families. Rewrite each one in full.

1. I am not understanding the new system.

2. I am wanting more time on this.

3. I am working in a bank. I have been there nine years.

4. Normally I am working from home on Tuesdays.

5. She want to leave early.

6. My colleague train the new people every year.

7. I am liking this project a lot.

8. He is having two brothers.

Teacher note Items 1, 2, 7 and 8 all need the -s check after the tense fix — and two of them need it. That double step is exactly where the second treatment of the -s earns its place in this unit.
Open Cloze · pass 2

No visible errors this time. Write the verb in brackets in the right tense and form.

My brother (work) for a bank — he (be) there eleven years. At the moment he (do) a course two evenings a week, which he (not / enjoy). He (say) it is useful, but he (want) his evenings back. Normally he (get) home at six. This month he (get) home at ten.

05
Communicative Task · 12 min

The same three minutes, clean

Task card · Speaking

The same four sections about your week. Three minutes.

Fewer than three errors from the three families. Your teacher logs again, so the two logs compare directly.

  • Do not slow down. Accuracy at normal speed is the target.
  • Keep the signposts — they are what stop you settling into one tense.
  • Ask for the number before you hear the sentences.
Teacher note Keep the three counts separate. State verbs and continuous-for-permanent respond to the rule; the third-person -s responds to speed and attention, and if it has gone up while the other two went down, that is her attention budget being spent on the tense — say so, because it reads as backsliding otherwise.
Mid-task check

Stop at ninety seconds.

1. Which family is still slipping?

2. Compared with Lesson 5?

06
Feedback & Reflection · 5 min

Three counts, twice

Self-assessment

Compare the six numbers your teacher just read.

1. Did the state-verb errors go down?

2. And the third-person -s?

3. Why would the -s go up while the tense errors go down?

Teacher note Question 3 is the honest and useful finding of this lesson. Say it plainly: a rising -s count alongside falling tense errors is not backsliding, it is the cost of monitoring — and it resolves as the tense choice automates. Unit 11 gives the -s its third treatment for exactly this reason.
07
Wrap-up & Bridge · 3 min

One test to keep

Exit check

Rebuild the test in the right order.

1
2
3
4
5

Before Lesson 7. Next lesson you write 150 words: "What I Do", including what you are working on at the moment.

Tonight, decide your four sections and write nothing else. Four headings, four words each at most.