Lexis Careers › Architecture › Unit 07 › Lesson 08

The Impervious Surface Memo

B2 Code & Compliance
About this lesson ▾

The compliance memo — the real one, for Silverwood Drive, written to go to the County. Then back to what you wrote in Lesson 1.

XP 0 Streak 0 First-try —
Lesson progress0%
01
Warm-up · 4 min

Your materials

Lay out what you brought. Anything missing is a gap in the memo before you have written a word — name it now rather than discovering it in the third paragraph.

02
The brief · 8 min

What a compliance memo has to do

Assessment criteria

CriterionWhat it meansWeight
StructureRequirement → evidence → conclusion, in that order, for every point30%
PrecisionExact figures; no hedging of anything you know25%
AuthorityThe limit is cited, not asserted25%
HonestyGenuine uncertainty is named, with its effect on the conclusion20%

Note the last criterion. A memo that quietly excludes the artificial turf to make the number look better is not a stronger memo — it is one that falls apart the moment a planner asks. Naming the uncertainty and showing the conclusion holds either way is worth more than a cleaner figure.

03
Preparation · 8 min

Plan the memo

On one sheet, before writing:

  • The requirement, with its citation
  • The existing figure, by line item and total
  • The proposed figure, by line item and total
  • The comparison — absolute and proportional
  • The conclusion, stated against the limit
  • Any classification uncertainty, and the figure both ways
Teacher note If she cannot produce the citation, that is the memo’s real weakness and it is better found now. A memo that says “within the permitted coverage” without saying permitted by what is exactly the assert-don’t-cite failure from Lesson 1.
04
Unit Task · 20 min

Write the memo

Portfolio piece 7 of 10

Silverwood Drive · impervious surface · addressed to the County

Write the memo you would actually send.

  • 250–350 words. Longer usually means you are explaining the design rather than proving compliance.
  • Tables are allowed and encouraged — put the line items in a table and the argument in prose.
  • Read it aloud before calling it done. Every hedge you hear covering a known figure comes out.
05
Then and Now · 12 min

Lesson 1, revisited

Put the four-to-six sentences you wrote in Lesson 1 beside the memo and answer:

  1. Did the Lesson 1 version reach a stated conclusion, or stop at the numbers?
  2. Did it cite the limit, or assume it?
  3. How many hedges were in it? How many are in the memo?
Error Correction

A final check on the unit. Each sentence has one error.

1. The proposed coverage does not exceed to the permitted maximum.

2. Engineering is required unless the wall be over four feet.

3. The design shall account for surcharge unless a wall retains additional load.

4. Impervious surface is reduced to 2,963 SF from 1,209 SF.

5. Proposed impervious surface is around 1,200 SF, so it should comply.

Teacher note Full marks with no hints means Unit 7 is consolidated. Item 4 is the sneakiest — the sentence is perfectly grammatical and states the opposite of the truth, which is exactly the kind of error that survives proofreading and reaches a planner.
06
Wrap-up · 4 min

Unit 7 complete

You can now: explain a code requirement, demonstrate whether a design meets it, read a permit stamp and know who each line binds, and hold a compliance argument with a planner who disagrees. That is the B2 can-do statement for this unit, and it is signed off.

Next unit: plan check and revisions — what to do when the correction list arrives, how to log what changed, and how to disagree in writing without losing the job.

Homework before Unit 8. Bring the Silverwood revision set — the stamped one with the dated revisions log. Find the entry that reads “Square Footage Changed” and be ready to say what it conceals.